Published on bearblog

Searching for Nothing, Finding a Surprise

Following on from my post yesterday about an edge case in YouTube, I thought I’d write about a class of edge cases perhaps even more strange that I’ve been exploring recently:

Search engines are a fact of daily life for most of the population nowadays. Google (sub your preferred provider) is an extension of the brain, imagined as giving you access to the sum of the world’s information at the click of a button. But a search engine isn’t just a Ctrl-F for the internet with a nice interface and ads; rather it’s a tremendously complicated system with lots of features and interactions between those features. And all you need to explore the system yourself is some well-tuned search queries.

I recently had an epiphany: search engines are designed to find you results for something and that’s a job they perform well. But there’s nothing stopping you from searching for nothing! And the search engines will still give you results!

And what results they are - have a go on the links below:

An empty query on DDG: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=+””
A different empty query on DDG: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=(“”)
An empty query on Google: https://www.google.com/search?q=(“”)
An empty query on Google News: https://www.google.com/search?q=”“&tbm=nws

And have you ever thought about doing an anything but search? Normally you can add negations to the end of your search term to remove unwanted results, but there’s nothing stopping you from having a search term consisting entirely of negations!

Here’s one on DDG: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=-“an entirely negated query”
On Bing: https://www.bing.com/search?q=-“an entirely negated query”
And on Google Books: https://www.google.com/search?q=-“nothing to see here”&tbm=bks

Commentary

Google appears to have some half-effective filtering for these empty search queries so you’ll mostly get the same two YouTube videos as a result - is this an Easter egg? Although Google News and Books don’t have any filter, and you do get some odd results there!

DuckDuckGo doesn’t appear to have any filtering at all, although it’s obvious just how much DDG relies on Bing’s whitelabel product for its results by looking at how similar the two are.

If you can think of a deeper reason for these results, please do leave a comment and lets try and explain some of the mystery away.

Comments

No comments yet!

To leave a comment, please send it via email here. Comments are licensed CC-BY as with the rest of the site. Your sender name and email address will be published along with the comment, unless you tell me not to.


Articles from other blogs I follow

Arty hot air balloon to fly over Thamesmead

As part of an art event, a 25-metre tall hot air balloon will fly over Thamesmead in southeast London over the next couple of monthsRead more › This article was published on ianVisits SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE This website has been running now for just over a dec…

via ianVisits August 10, 2022

Responsible Disclosure: XSS in Macmillan's Website

Another day, another unfiltered reflection of user-supplied content! You know how this goes by now. You type into a search box <em>test and the whole page suddenly turns italic. Luckily, the Macmillan Publishers' website filtered out any <scr…

via Terence Eden’s Blog August 10, 2022

How I wish I could organize my thoughts

I keep a pen & notebook on my desk, which I make liberal use of to jot down my thoughts. It works pretty well: ad-hoc todo lists, notes on problems I’m working on, tables, flowcharts, etc. It has some limitations, though. Sharing anything out of my noteb…

via Drew DeVault's blog August 10, 2022

Generated by openring


All posts on bearblog are licensed as CC-BY rss